Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 22275 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2003 11:39:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 22255 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2003 11:39:06 -0000 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: "Cocoon-Dev" Subject: Sitemap-Engine for 2.0.5 Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 12:39:10 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 31.01.2003 12:39:03, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 31.01.2003 12:39:04, Serialize complete at 31.01.2003 12:39:04 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Is anyone against making the treeprocessor the default engine for 2.0.5? Is anyone against removing the stylesheet engine? I don't think that we have to keep it for compatibility issues. Carsten Carsten Ziegeler Open Source Group, S&N AG --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org