Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 82109 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2003 06:58:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 82097 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2003 06:58:30 -0000 Subject: Re: Creation of the Cocoon PMC From: David Crossley To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org In-Reply-To: <200301212244.h0LMi0403498@localhost.localdomain> References: <3E2DA583.5090303@anyware-tech.com> <200301212244.h0LMi0403498@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 22 Jan 2003 17:58:32 +1100 Message-Id: <1043218713.1998.33040.camel@ighp> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Rating: 208.185.179.12.available.above.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N gstein@apache.org wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > Sylvain Wallez wrote: > >... > >> Cool ! But why does this legal speech have be so hard to understand ? > > > > Unfortunately, the Apache Software Foundation is a legal corporation, > > and therefore, for all its official proceedings, we need to use that > > kind of language... > > > > I don't think you'll find any of the ASF members (me included) liking > > that kind of "formalism", but unfortunately those are official documents > > of an official corporation, and there's not much you can do (if we wrote > > it for coders, lawyers then wouldn't be able to read them)... > > Yup. > > And thankfully, the only people that really need to deal with the stuff > is the ASF Board. Periodically, it "reaches out", but mostly the project > committers can simply ignore the stuff. > > The real goal is that the ASF exists to deal with these legal issues, and > free up the coders to do what they do best: create great, free code. Actually the legalese does make it difficult for committers in one way. I sometimes need to drag *.java cvs commit email messages out of the spam bucket. SpamAssassin has put them in there because of the "lines_of_yelling". Why is it that these legal documents and *.java headers need to use all uppercase characters? Is this just a silly trend? Surely the same text in lowercase would still be legal. --David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org