Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 51747 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2003 06:13:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 51727 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2003 06:13:29 -0000 Message-ID: <071701c2c8ef$eedd61a0$0100a8c0@MAUCHI> From: "Ivelin Ivanov" To: References: Subject: Re: WSProxy: is there a rationale... Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:13:54 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Not really. Just a first implementation. -=Ivelin=- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pier Fumagalli" To: Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 6:37 AM Subject: WSProxy: is there a rationale... > Is there a rationale behind the fact that the WSProxy generator reads the > entire response into a string first and handles THAT to the parser? > > Pier > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org