Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 15490 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2002 11:05:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 15479 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2002 11:05:49 -0000 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: PATCH QUEUE... downsizing...? Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:05:20 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 03.12.2002 12:05:58, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 03.12.2002 12:06:01, Serialize complete at 03.12.2002 12:06:01 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Yes, we should :) (perhaps after the 2.0.4 release) So any volunteers? Thanks Carsten > -----Original Message----- > From: Morrison, John [mailto:John.Morrison@uk.experian.com] > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 1:32 PM > To: 'cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org' > Subject: PATCH QUEUE... downsizing...? > > > Should we try and either apply or discard some of these? > > J. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org