cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Carsten Ziegeler" <>
Subject RE: [RT] A deprecated module
Date Wed, 04 Dec 2002 11:44:54 GMT
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > I still think that the current "blocks" we have in the cvs head are the
> > modules - and when we introduced them, I proposed to call them modules
> > first. Ok, but that's the past - let's be constructive.
> Currently they are in fact packaged as "modules", ie as jars that need 
> to be there at startup. In this I agree with you.
> But IIUC there is no code there that cannot be in the future repackaged 
> in a cob and be dynamically loaded. There are only Cocoon Components and 
> Avalon Components.


> Making a deprecated thing, would probably become a deprecated block for 
> deprecated Cocoon components, and a deprecated module for Cocoon modules 
> (ie all that can be taken out of Cocoon core but is not to go in COBs).
> > I'm fine with the name modules and this separation. But then we should
> > perhaps rename the modules.xml to something else.
> the root module.xml?

Yupp :)

> hehehe, that's the gump descriptor, some call it gump.xml, some 
> projectname.xml, I called it module.xml because of CVS module.
> hehehe it does create confusion. What would you prefer as a name?
> project-info.xml ?

Good choice! +1 for project-info.xml 


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, email:

View raw message