Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 21458 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2002 09:53:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 21447 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2002 09:53:41 -0000 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: Release Plan for 2.0.4 Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:53:57 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1037916603.12715.130379.camel@ighp> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 22.11.2002 10:49:34, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 22.11.2002 10:53:53, Serialize complete at 22.11.2002 10:53:53 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N David Crossley wrote: > > I would have liked to add the build-time validation of > config and xdocs to 2.0.4 as i think that it addresses > a major lack. > > However, it still needs help from some Ant build expert > to get it into the 2.1-dev build system, then i could port > it to 2.0.4 > > Is that possible? > What exactly has to be done in the build system? Carsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org