Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Message-ID: <3DE59FFF.9060903@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 23:47:59 -0500
From: Vadim Gritsenko <vadim.gritsenko@verizon.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vote] Cocoon citizenship for Matthew Langham
References: <MLEAJJEAAELCMLAIJNFICEMEFDAA.mlangham@sundn.de>
 <20021127141336.1A31723CD8@dj.codeconsult.ch> <3DE50C9A.70201@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <MLEAJJEAAELCMLAIJNFICEMEFDAA.mlangham@sundn.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:

...

>
> All right. I hereby propose Matthew Langham for commit access.
>
> What he will commit is up to him, hopefully something :)
>
> No, seriously, there has been a huge amount of discussions on 
> community@apache.org about the role of committership compared to 
> membership. Some projects have been accused to give away commit access 
> as *free candy*. I disagree. Delegation is a strenght.
>
> I'd rather have 20 idle committers than leaving a possible committer 
> out there.
>
> Committership is not about 'writing code', is about being 'a citizen 
> of the cocoon community'. And citizens have a passport that lets them 
> into the country easy. Our country is our CVS module.
>
> Result, I don't see why Matthew, which has helped cocoon immensively 
> and continously in the past 18 months, shouldn't deserve cocoon 
> citizenship.
>
> Place your vote.


+1

Vadim


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org