Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] build-time XML validation via RELAX NG
References: <1035953501.1245.2838.camel@ighp>
	<m3wuo0z6fr.fsf@colina.demon.co.uk> <1036031450.1246.9614.camel@ighp>
From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@colina.demon.co.uk>
Date: 31 Oct 2002 11:01:01 +0000
In-Reply-To: <1036031450.1246.9614.camel@ighp>
Message-ID: <m3d6pqzxci.fsf@colina.demon.co.uk>
Lines: 17
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

>>>>> "David" == David Crossley <crossley@indexgeo.com.au> writes:

    David> I notice that the RNG grammar is catering for the
    David> deliberately broken lint/sitemap.xmap 

Actually, it's not deliberately broken - the invalid bits are
commented out.
What I've been doing is then to uncomment them one-by-one to test the
power of the grammar to reject invalid constructs. Those that it fails
to reject, I have added as comments to the grammar file, to provoke
thoughts on what to tackle next.
However, I finding it quite hard to see how to tackle these cases. I
can't work out what the rules ought to be. They are certainly more
complex than the comments against these invalid cases suggest.
-- 
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org