Return-Path: 
 <cocoon-dev-return-32298-apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 28269 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2002 07:48:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>
Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 28252 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2002 07:48:35 -0000
From: "Luca Morandini" <spectrum.morandini@ipzs.it>
To: <cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>
Subject: R: Is this as anomaly ?
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:48:37 +0200
Message-ID: <NDBBKDCIJJLOICOIDEJDAEMCCDAA.spectrum.morandini@ipzs.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <NDBBKDCIJJLOICOIDEJDAEKLCDAA.spectrum.morandini@ipzs.it>
X-AntiSpam: Checked for restricted content by Gordano's AntiSpam Software
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Folks,

I've sent the following message a couple days ago and no answer came. I'd
like only to know whether this is an anomaly to put into BugZilla, or it is
the intended behaviour: any good soul listening ?

Best regards,

P.S.
By the way, I deem this mis-handling of the document() function serious
enough, since it breaks Cocoon's XSLT support

> ---------------------------------------------
>                Luca Morandini
>                GIS Consultant
>               lmorandini@ieee.org
> http://utenti.tripod.it/lmorandini/index.html
> ---------------------------------------------

> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Luca Morandini [mailto:spectrum.morandini@ipzs.it]
> Inviato: mercoled� 23 ottobre 2002 14.09
> A: Cocoon-dev
> Oggetto: Is this as anomaly ?
>
>
> Folks,
>
> When the "incremental-processing" attribute of the XSLT-processor
> is set to
> "true", the "document()" XSLT function returns a string and NOT a node-set
> (as
> it is supposed to do).
>
> Hence, if you want something like:
> <xsl:copy-of select="document('test.xml')"/>
>
> to work properly, youd should modify cocoon.xconf, setting
> "inremental-processing" to "false", like in:
> <xslt-processor
> class="org.apache.cocoon.components.xslt.XSLTProcessorImpl"
> 	logger="core.xslt-processor">
> 	<parameter name="use-store" value="true"/>
> 	<parameter name="incremental-processing" value="false"/>
> </xslt-processor>
>
> Is this as an anomaly or it supposed to behave this way ?
>
> Best regards,
>
> P.S.
> BTW, in Cocoon 2.0.2 the default was "false", while in the 2.0.3 it is
> "true", therefore, I hade an hard time to figure this out :(
>
> ---------------------------------------------
>                Luca Morandini
>                GIS Consultant
>               lmorandini@ieee.org
> http://utenti.tripod.it/lmorandini/index.html
> ---------------------------------------------



     We are protected from the virus by Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org