Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 52769 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2002 07:14:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 52757 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2002 07:14:31 -0000 Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:13:07 +0200 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT]: InputModules interfaces Message-ID: <20021008071306.GD26779@bremen.dvs1.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> Reply-To: haul@informatik.tu-darmstadt.de References: <20021007163412.GB26779@bremen.dvs1.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Databases and Distributed Systems Group, Darmstadt University of Technology From: Christian Haul X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 08.Oct.2002 -- 08:09 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > So, summarizing this, it seems that we agree on changing the InputModule > interface to > > o.a.c.components.modules.InputModule > { > Object getAttribute( String name, Map objectModel ) throws > ProcessingException; > > Iterator getAttributeNames( Map objectModel ) throws ProcessingException; > > Object[] getAttributeValues( String name, Map objectModel ) throws > ProcessingException; > } > > Everyone happy with this? Not happy but OK ;-) Just one thing: Where should the other two interfaces go? o.a.c.components.modules.OutputModule o.a.c.components.modules.AutoIncrementModule then? Chris. -- C h r i s t i a n H a u l haul@informatik.tu-darmstadt.de fingerprint: 99B0 1D9D 7919 644A 4837 7D73 FEF9 6856 335A 9E08 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org