Return-Path: 
 <cocoon-dev-return-32289-apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 46846 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2002 23:24:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>
Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 46835 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2002 23:24:17 -0000
From: "Argyn" <akuketayev@cox.net>
To: <cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>
Subject: RE: XSP vrs. transforms.
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:24:35 -0700
Message-ID: <000901c27bcd$a9742af0$0200a8c0@argynhome>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <3DB82E30.3000208@verizon.net>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Now it's absolutely clear that XSPs will be thrown away

:)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:vadim.gritsenko@verizon.net]
> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:30 AM
> To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: XSP vrs. transforms.
> 
> 
> Christian Haul wrote:
> 
> > Enke, Michael wrote:
> >
> >> Also in computer magazin articles from Matthew and Carsten
> >> I read the same: XSP has no future in Cocoon.
> >> But in my mind I can do things with xsp much easier and more
> >> flexible than with transformers.
> >> I did not follow the discussions about this topic but
> >> I cann't imagine that xsp will really be thrown away.
> >
> >
> > I don't believe that XSP will be actively removed anytime. 
> Afterall, 
> > this has been part of Cocoon since version 1.
> 
> 
> And I _know_ it won't be removed. :)
> 
> 
> > I, too, believe that there are many things that can be done more 
> > easily with XSP than with transformers.
> >
> > But I believe as well, that XSP should be avoided to code 'real' 
> > logic. That would probably not go into transformers but 
> into actions 
> > and flow.
> 
> 
> How about following classification?
> Action             - Real logic
> XSP                - Unreal logic
> Transformers   - Surreal logic
> :)
> 
> Vadim
> 
> 
> >     Chris.
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org