cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Carsten Ziegeler" <>
Subject RE: defaulting to a matcher when another one is not present
Date Mon, 07 Oct 2002 11:26:41 GMT
Torsten Curdt wrote:
> This reminds me on the cocoon get-together at the cebit where 
> someone wanted 
> components _not_ to be inherited.
> I have to admit that I stumbled over the same question as Ovidiu 
> did lately.
> What happens (or should happen) if you have an unmatched uri 
> that's within the 
> scope of a subsitemap. If the subsitemap is fully autonomous it 
> should handle 
> the error. But if not - shouldn't it be passed to the parent sitemap? 
> Otherwise I would have to define the error handling in each subsitemap.
> This doesn't sound like FS to me. In fact it could reduce 
> redundancy a lot...
Ok, I agree that error handling might be different, but if I'm not
wrong, it already works: If you don't have an error handler for
"resource not found" in your subsitemap, but one in your main sitemap
where the map:mount is located, this should catch the error.

> Well, I do think we need at least some clearer definitions here. 


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, email:

View raw message