cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Amir Rosen" <a...@cti2.com>
Subject RE: [OT] Googlefight
Date Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:46:58 GMT
what might be interesting is comparing the number of links to each site:

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=link:http%3A%2F%2Fxml%2Eapache%2Eorg%2Fcocoon%2F

2,660 links to http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=link:http%3A%2F%2Fjakarta%2Eapache%2Eorg%2Fstruts%2F

1,460 links to http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=link:http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ezope%2Eorg%2F

20,300 links to http://www.zope.org/


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:stefano@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:31 AM
> To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [OT] Googlefight
> 
> 
> Quoting Piroumian Konstantin <KPiroumian@protek.com>:
> 
> > Another comparison: Cocoon vs. Struts. 
> > 
> > 
> http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=Cocoon&q2=Str
> uts&B1=I%27m+F
> > eeling+Groggy%21%21+Go%21&compare=1&langue=us
> > 
> > Result could seem amazing, knowing how popular is Struts. 
> But after a moment
> > I've realized that so few searches can also indicate more 
> visibility of the
> > project (I mean that Struts does not need to be searched, 
> cause it's well
> > known). So returning to the Cocoon vs. Zope case, if Cocoon 
> is searched less
> > than Zope this can mean also that Cocoon is easier to find 
> by other means
> > (e.g. directly from Apache site).
> 
> Hmmm, while I was craching up to see that googlefight web 
> (isn't human 
> creativity so amazing sometimes?), with my semantic hat on 
> and with purity mode 
> turned on, I would say that the above is purely and 
> absolutely useless.
> 
> look at 
> 
>  http://www.cocoon1.com
> 
> and you know what I mean :)
> 
> In a really semantic search engine, we would have our own URI 
> point to our own 
> topic and we could be able to have a fair 
> semantic-searchfight... but that 
> would mean that, for example, the search engine should be 
> inferring smart 
> enough to understand that if I talk about 'cocoon' on the 'cocoon-
> dev@xml.apache.org' mail list, than that token should be 
> associated with the 
> topic related to http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/
> 
> Yeah, it would be cool, but totally impractical since you'd 
> have to write your 
> emails using RDF-like markup.
> 
> Bah, I should burn this stupid semantic hat one day.
>  
> -- 
> Stefano Mazzocchi                       <stefano@apache.org>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message