cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vadim Gritsenko <vadim.gritse...@verizon.net>
Subject Re: [OT] Googlefight
Date Wed, 09 Oct 2002 15:01:55 GMT
Amir Rosen wrote:

>what might be interesting is comparing the number of links to each site:
>
>http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=link:http%3A%2F%2Fxml%2Eapache%2Eorg%2Fcocoon%2F
>
>2,660 links to http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/
>
>http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=link:http%3A%2F%2Fjakarta%2Eapache%2Eorg%2Fstruts%2F
>
>1,460 links to http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/
>
>http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=link:http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ezope%2Eorg%2F
>
>20,300 links to http://www.zope.org/
>

... and in reality it is only 1000 links:

http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://www.zope.org/&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&start=990&sa=N&filter=0

Vadim



>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:stefano@apache.org]
>>Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:31 AM
>>To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
>>Subject: RE: [OT] Googlefight
>>
>>
>>Quoting Piroumian Konstantin <KPiroumian@protek.com>:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Another comparison: Cocoon vs. Struts. 
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=Cocoon&q2=Str
>>uts&B1=I%27m+F
>>    
>>
>>>eeling+Groggy%21%21+Go%21&compare=1&langue=us
>>>
>>>Result could seem amazing, knowing how popular is Struts. 
>>>      
>>>
>>But after a moment
>>    
>>
>>>I've realized that so few searches can also indicate more 
>>>      
>>>
>>visibility of the
>>    
>>
>>>project (I mean that Struts does not need to be searched, 
>>>      
>>>
>>cause it's well
>>    
>>
>>>known). So returning to the Cocoon vs. Zope case, if Cocoon 
>>>      
>>>
>>is searched less
>>    
>>
>>>than Zope this can mean also that Cocoon is easier to find 
>>>      
>>>
>>by other means
>>    
>>
>>>(e.g. directly from Apache site).
>>>      
>>>
>>Hmmm, while I was craching up to see that googlefight web 
>>(isn't human 
>>creativity so amazing sometimes?), with my semantic hat on 
>>and with purity mode 
>>turned on, I would say that the above is purely and 
>>absolutely useless.
>>
>>look at 
>>
>> http://www.cocoon1.com
>>
>>and you know what I mean :)
>>
>>In a really semantic search engine, we would have our own URI 
>>point to our own 
>>topic and we could be able to have a fair 
>>semantic-searchfight... but that 
>>would mean that, for example, the search engine should be 
>>inferring smart 
>>enough to understand that if I talk about 'cocoon' on the 'cocoon-
>>dev@xml.apache.org' mail list, than that token should be 
>>associated with the 
>>topic related to http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/
>>
>>Yeah, it would be cool, but totally impractical since you'd 
>>have to write your 
>>emails using RDF-like markup.
>>
>>Bah, I should burn this stupid semantic hat one day.
>> 
>>-- 
>>Stefano Mazzocchi                       <stefano@apache.org>
>>------------------------------------------------------------
>>    
>>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message