Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 24498 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2002 14:06:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 24481 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2002 14:06:48 -0000 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: Getting rid of deprecated Interfaces/Classes/Methods Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:10:04 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <0109D6A3-CFC6-11D6-9C97-000393B61B56@apache.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 24.09.2002 16:06:47, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 24.09.2002 16:06:48, Serialize complete at 24.09.2002 16:06:48 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ok, I think we should have a look at a features list of fortress and merlin compared to the ECM. Is this somewhere available? I learned by this thread that some marker interface are not available anymore and have to be configured somewhere for fortress. Is this right? So which marker interfaces are concerned? C How much effort is it to still support those marker interfaces without needing the extra configuration? Carsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org