From cocoon-dev-return-31394-apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org Tue Sep 24 16:56:03 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 76612 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2002 16:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 76601 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2002 16:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <3D909AA7.40502@apache.org> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 13:02:31 -0400 From: Berin Loritsch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Getting rid of deprecated Interfaces/Classes/Methods References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stephan Michels wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > For some time ago, I tried to replace also the deprecated LogKitManageable > classes, but the Avalon people don't want to apply my patch :-/ > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11491 I think it has more to do with the fact that we are all busy and it keeps slipping through the cracks. >>>>2. can be done in two steps: >>>> >>>> a. move from Component to Service infrastructure as the >>>>ExcaliburComponentManager supports this. >>>> >>>> b. use Fortress/Merlin (don't know the status of those and which one >>>>makes more sense for Cocoon to be used, so I need some advice of >>>>Avalonians here) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>What does this mean in terms of compatibility and a stable Cocoon? Are >>>written components using a CM with Composable and Component still working? >>>I think noone will recode all the components he has written so far. But >>>I guess that this is covered. >>> >>>So the remaining question is, is fortress/merlin stable and usable? >>>If these both points can be answered positiv, I would say: +1. >>> >> >>-1 for 2.1. If you read this thread, you will see that the changes are >>too drastic to make this in 2.1, and it already has loads of changes by >>itself. This asks for at least 2.5, or even 3.0. > > > Couldn't we release the damn 2.1, and remove all the deprecated classes? > Then we will have enough room to migrate to Fortress/Merlin or whatever. By all means, release 2.1. Don't migrate to Fortress until there is an official release--which I believe work is starting on it now. -- "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org