cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rony G. Flatscher" <>
Subject BSF - *any* knowledge at all in this group ? (Re: BSF (Bean Scripting Framework) and Cocoon's usage of it ?? (Re: Seeking help on BSF calling a non-Java language engine (Rexx) ...
Date Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:49:39 GMT
Hi there,

so far I have not received one answer to the BSF-related question. As I really want to get
the Rexx
and Object Rexx BSF engines to work flawlessly with cocoon, I wonder what I could do from
this point

Would the Xalan-group be more knowledgable/willing to help?



"Rony G. Flatscher" schrieb:

> Hi there,
> a couple of days ago I posted a question regarding the Bean Scripting
> Framework's (BSF) usage of Cocoon. BSF allows Java programs to invoke
> functions/scripts/programs written in non-Java languages and
> originates
> in an IBM alphawork project. In the past months a process has taken
> place to hand it over to Apache.
> The problem: using BSF to add functions to XSLT works nicely with the
> JavaScriptEngine of BSF, but does not work yet, if using the
> RexxEngine
> (either with the open source Regina Rexx interpreter or IBM's Object
> Rexx, which is free for Linux, BTW).
> The reason: "Cocoon" uses the call()-method and supplies the name of
> the
> function (as defined in the appropriate XSLT document) and the
> arguments
> but not the source code, containing the Rexx code to be executed.
> Short of any other documentation, there is no way at the moment to
> determine the location of the source code (in this case embedded in a
> CDATA-section in the XSLT-file).
> Hence the plea for help: where is the source code stored, how can one
> retrieve the source-code at run-time?
> Any help or any hint is highly appreciated!
> Regards,
> ---rony
> Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
> >Hi there,
> >
> >have tried to research the mail-archives, the documentation and the
> FAQ, but have not come up with a
> >solution to a BSF-related problem, so my request for help in this
> group of very ;) knowledgable
> >people. Here's the problem:
> >
> >Extending the functionality of XSLT by defining a Rexx function which
> should get called with the
> >help of BSF during an XSLT-transformation. Obviously the
> call()-Method is invoked and not apply(),
> >which would supply the source-code in the form of a String.
> >
> >The BSF RexxEnigne call() method receives the declared function-name
> and the argument(s), but not
> >the source code. Here's the question: how is it possible at runtime
> to get a hold of the source code
> >(this is needed to be passed on to the used Rexx interpreter)?
> >[Obviously, the RexxEngine is found and its call() Method is used, so
> that part would be o.k.]
> >
> >Please, if you have any insights or hints which may help solve this
> problem, then please do!
> >
> >(Would there be a way to force apply() to be used instead of call(),
> which would supply the source?
> >Or, could one indicate that the object-argument supplied to call()
> which is set to null should
> >possess the sourcecode?)
> >
> >---
> >
> >Should you need an example (XSLT defining the extension embedding the
> Rexx code etc. and a short
> >XML-file to be processed, URL to the Rexx-support for BSF), then
> please let me know.
> >
> >Thanks in advance,
> >
> >---rony
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, email:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, email:

View raw message