Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 11733 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2002 09:50:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 11717 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2002 09:50:45 -0000 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: [cvs 2.0.4] roadmap? Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 11:53:56 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <20020809111849.D10009@bremen.dvs1.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> Importance: Normal X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 09.08.2002 11:50:57, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 09.08.2002 11:50:58, Serialize complete at 09.08.2002 11:50:58 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Christian Haul wrote: > > Team, > > Currently the implementation of modules in 2.1 and 2.0.4 differ in > that in 2.1 they switched from using the request object to using the > objectModel. Obviosely, all components that make use of them are > affected by it. This makes it more difficult than necessary to keep > both branches up to date. > > Since it affects only scratchpad in 2.0.4 and 2.1 is planned for 2003, > I'd like to sync this aspect in both branches again. Objections? > Go for it! > As a sidenote, if 2.1 will take some while as it seems, should we > consider to backport some 'cool' features? I volunteer to backport > usage of InputModules for the compiled sitemap. Mmh, would help to > have them moved out of scratchpad for that. > Hmm, I'm a little bit against this - as I see the problem that we start backporting more and more and finally have no differences between 2.1 and 2.0.x. And I think 2003 is way too late for the 2.1 release, we should focus on the important things and get 2.1 before winter. Even if that means moving some things back into the scratchpad. Carsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org