Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 59954 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2002 13:13:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 59938 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2002 13:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: <111CCE21E90FD511A7BE0002B325AFDEEC17BB@MAIL> From: Argyn Kuketayev To: "'cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org'" Subject: RE: Is Cocoon unstable? Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:12:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C2445D.7986F450" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2445D.7986F450 Content-Type: text/plain > -----Original Message----- > From: Giacomo Pati [mailto:giacomo@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 9:04 AM > To: Cocoon-Dev > Subject: Re: Is Cocoon unstable? > And I'd like to add it is fast compared to > similar products > (if you'd like to compare Cocoon with other products). what similar products you mean? I know some people who didn't implement cocoon, because it wasn't enough for them during load tests. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2445D.7986F450 Content-Type: text/html RE: Is Cocoon unstable?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Giacomo Pati [mailto:giacomo@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 9:04 AM
> To: Cocoon-Dev
> Subject: Re: Is Cocoon unstable?

> And I'd like to add it is fast compared to
> similar products
> (if you'd like to compare Cocoon with other products).

what similar products you mean?

I know some people who didn't implement cocoon, because it wasn't enough for them during load tests.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C2445D.7986F450--