cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Crossley <cross...@indexgeo.com.au>
Subject Re: [cvs 2.0.4] roadmap?
Date Sun, 11 Aug 2002 12:06:10 GMT
Christian Haul wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > Christian Haul wrote:
<snip/>
> > > As a sidenote, if 2.1 will take some while as it seems, should we
> > > consider to backport some 'cool' features? I volunteer to backport
> > > usage of InputModules for the compiled sitemap. Mmh, would help to
> > > have them moved out of scratchpad for that.
> > > 
> > Hmm, I'm a little bit against this - as I see the problem that we
> > start backporting more and more and finally have no differences
> > between 2.1 and 2.0.x.
> 
> So? Really, why shouldn't 2.0.x evolve into 2.1 some day? At least if we
> don't put unstable or incompatible features in it. Having a development
> branch and a release branch is IMHO better than scratchpad :-) And the
> linux kernel does that quite well.

This spurred me to scan the archives. I remembered that we
had discussion about this in 2001-12 where it seemed that
branch management was going to become easier.
-----
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=100857610623046
Re: patch politics
<quote who="Carsten">
Hm, I hope that not the whole HEAD is experimental. It *should* be very
similar to the 2.0 branch, except for some experimental components.

We created the 2.0 branch some month ago exactly for this experimental
stuff which is now much better located in the scratchpad directory.
So we really should move all experimental code of 2.1 into scratchpad,
sync 2.1 with 2.0 and then only use the HEAD. If we than make a 2.0.1
very fast we can forget about the 2.0 branch.
</quote>
-----



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message