Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 34625 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jul 2002 12:37:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 34614 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2002 12:37:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Torsten Curdt Organization: dff internet & medien To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove SQLTransformer in 2.1 Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:37:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 References: <001001c22aa4$01f4f8b0$0a00a8c0@vgritsenkopc> In-Reply-To: <001001c22aa4$01f4f8b0$0a00a8c0@vgritsenkopc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200207141437.44574.tcurdt@dff.st> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Saturday 13 July 2002 21:32, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:acoliver@apache.org] > > > > Vadim, > > > > My parade was to do achieve the following: > > > > 1. Excite a final decision on whether the SQLTransformer is deprecate= d > > or not > > 2. Excite an effort (if not) to clean both SQLTransformer and ESQL if > > not (SQLTransformer is *slow*) > > > > It sounds like the answer is there is a need still for SQLTransformer= =2E > > Once I'm done with the tasks I'm working on right now, I'll look int= o > > working to combine their sharable codebases and make them > > prettier/faster. > > No objections, that's the way to go. Yepp! Andrew, give me a mail when you are ready to start... =2E..maybe we can work this out together... -- Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org