From cocoon-dev-return-28926-apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org Mon Jul 01 07:23:48 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 18788 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2002 07:23:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 18768 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2002 07:23:47 -0000 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: SAXConnector use cases (was Re: [VOTE]: The future of the SAXConnector) Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:26:38 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <3D1DA8AE.9040407@anyware-tech.com> Importance: Normal X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01.07.2002 09:23:43, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01.07.2002 09:23:44, Serialize complete at 01.07.2002 09:23:44 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Spam-Rating: 209.66.108.5 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > > Yes. And as the current SAX connector is not fully suitable for this, > that's why I'm finally in favor of their removal. > Ok, so we all agree on removing them, right? I will do this today. Carsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org