cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Carsten Ziegeler" <cziege...@s-und-n.de>
Subject RE: [PROPOSAL] Remove SQLTransformer in 2.1
Date Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:15:02 GMT

Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> >-10
> >
> >The SQLTransformer provides a very good alternative to ESQL, it is in
> >some use cases more flexible as it is a transformer and not a generator.
> >And you don't need XSP to use it.
> >
> >The SQLTransformer in its current state is not a 1.x construct, it has
> >been redesigned several times and works afaik absolutely perfect. It
> >is used in production environments without any problems.
> >  
> >
> It is remarkably slower than ESQL.  Okay if you feel this strongly about 
> it then thats fine.  Would you
> be against refactoring the two and moving the common constructs to 
> common classes as Vadim suggested?
> 
No, refactoring sounds like a good idea as long as the SQLTransformer
is not dependend on any XSP stuff.

Carsten

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message