Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 82139 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2002 16:59:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 82127 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2002 16:59:45 -0000 From: "Per Kreipke" To: Subject: RE: Sitemap parameters failing... Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 13:01:44 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <003201c208fa$882186e0$7574558b@vgritsenkopc> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Vadim, > > - I'm using C2 (RC1 I think) and this bug still exists in the current > code > > when I look at the CVS code. > Can't reproduce. Are you sure that you are using latest (2.0.3 branch > CVS) sitemap.xsl? No, I'm definitely not. I meant by the line above that I compared the portion of the sitemap.xsl I'm using (2.0.2) with the version in CVS to see if the ordering was similar and I thought it was. However, I must admit that there was something strange about browsing CVS using the web interface to that particular file (sitemap.xsl), I recall having to try through a bunch of the targets to get any view of it at all. Clearly, it's my responsibility to see if I can prove that the bug still exists under the latest code. I'll attempt somehow to do that without updating my install to the latest CVS version [not sure we're ready for it :-)] Per --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org