Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 89210 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2002 06:29:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 89199 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2002 06:29:07 -0000 Message-ID: <3997D874A598D51190A70002A56BC995023685E0@TOCOMEXC17> From: TREGAN Fabien To: "'cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org'" Subject: RE: LinkAlarm> Full Check - 98 for Apache Cocoon Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 08:29:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >However, the "email addresses" page shows some weirdness. >There are some strange ones in the javadocs. There is >also an horrific number of email addresses, which would >be a goldmine for spam generators. Do we actually need >all of these email addresses in the docs? >--David Some of the addresses will still have to be present, so what about "crypting" the addresses (something like "fabien dot tregan at airbus dot com" or "forestantispam_fabien.tregan@airbus.com" ?) > >-----Forwarded Message----- > >From: LinkAlarm >To: crossley@indexgeo.com.au >Subject: LinkAlarm> Full Check - 98 for Apache Cocoon >Date: 03 Jun 2002 08:47:37 -0400 > >On 02 Jun 02 LinkAlarm checked the links on the site: > >"Apache Cocoon" >http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/ > > LinkAlarm Report: > http://reports.linkalarm.com/373104199608/ > > 9 Pages with Alarms > http://reports.linkalarm.com/373104199608/pages.1.html > > Site Control: Checking options for this site > http://my.linkalarm.com/353485108/373104199608 > >C H E C K R E S U L T > >Pages: 992 Score: 98 Failure: 1.1% > >Of the 992 pages checked, 9 (or 1%) were found to have one or >more alarms. > >LinkAlarm checked 1285 internal links and found 3 (or 0%) need >attention. >Internal links are URLs that point to files inside your site. > >LinkAlarm also checked 297 external links and found 17 (or 6%) >need attention. >External links are URLs that point to files outside your site. > >The LinkAlarm Score for this site (98) is an average of the >page and alarm >ratios above. A score of 100 indicates all links checked >reported no alarms. > >The link failure rate for this site (1.1%) is better than >the benchmark link failure rate of 4.4% for the category - >Computers & Internet. >See http://LinkQuality.com/ for more about the link failure benchmark. > >LinkAlarm noted the following issues when checking your site: > >- LinkAlarm did not verify 27 links during this check. See the >Links Not Checked section of your report. > >- 1 unique news link(s) identified. > >- LinkAlarm found 105 unique email address(es) and could not >verify successful delivery to 15 (or 14%). > >--------------------------------------------------------------- >LinkAlarm - Web Site Quality Assurance >Email: mailto:linkalarm@linkalarm.com Web: http://linkalarm.com > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org >For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org