Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 7324 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2002 13:29:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 7311 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2002 13:29:00 -0000 From: "Vadim Gritsenko" To: Subject: RE: [INFO] Sitemap XML Schema is available Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 09:28:25 -0400 Message-ID: <001a01c21b83$04f0a260$0a00a8c0@vgritsenkopc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Piroumian Konstantin [mailto:KPiroumian@protek.com] > > Bruno, > > > From: Bruno Dumon [mailto:bruno@outerthought.org] ... > > Some errors I found in the schema: > > > > * Additional configuration attributes and child elements on the > > component declarations are apparently not allowed by the schema. > > e.g. > foo-factor="5"/> > > Child elements were allowed, I don't know why did you get this error. And > I'm not sure that configuration attributes are allowed on component > declarations. Attributes are allowed. However, I never seen component that uses attributes. > Can anybody confirm/explain/answer: is having configuration attributes > really needed/used? Not needed, you can always replace them with elements. But same holds true for XML itself: why have attributes in XML language? :) Vadim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org