cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Torsten Curdt <>
Subject Re: [RT] SpitScript - B-Logic that doesn't suck ( Re: [RT] Flowmaps)
Date Sun, 23 Jun 2002 13:46:10 GMT

> > > There are yet many doubts to cover from the flowscript stuff that start
> > > talking about something else makes less sense ATM, IMHO.
> >
> > This is one of them.
> > Flowmaps are so powerfull that all the stuff that was innapropriate to
> > be done in the sitemap (heavy webapps) will automatically slip over to
> > flowmaps.
> > And since it's procedural, it's a *big* concern of mine that flowscript
> > will become the problem-solver catchall.
> I hear you, but since we all agree that business logic shouldn't be in
> the flowscript, I don't understand the need to discuss whether or not
> it's good to have business logic defined in a scripting language.
> This is an entirely separate concern.

...they are not entirely separate since the business logic might also 
influence the flow. There should be a good separation (SoC) but I think we 
need to see the full picture. So I don't think it's totally useless to talk 
about it right now - but we shouldn't mix it up...

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, email:

View raw message