Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
From: "Carsten Ziegeler" <cziegeler@s-und-n.de>
To: <cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>
Subject: RE: clarification of CVS branches
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 09:05:37 +0200
Message-ID: <GMEBIBHGAOFGJCDPJANDKELNEEAA.cziegeler@s-und-n.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0205101646460C.00997@igacer>
Importance: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"


> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Crossley [mailto:crossley@indexgeo.com.au]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 8:47 AM
> To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: clarification of CVS branches
> 
> 
> Would someone please clarify what needs to happen
> with documentation in regard to the CVS branches.
> 
> I have been updating some documents and adding some
> new ones. I have been adding this only to the HEAD of
> CVS and not into the 2.0.3 branch.
> 
> I gather that only code bugfixes need to go into the
> 2.0.3 branch. Is that correct? I am trying to minimise work.
> --David
> 
The 2.0.3 branch is a "bugfixes only" branch, this means no
new or experimental code should go in there.
I think if the documentation is valid for 2.0.3 as well
it should go there, too. Because if we do a 2.0.3 release
all will benefit from this new docs asap.

Carsten

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org