cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Crossley <cross...@indexgeo.com.au>
Subject Re: clarification of CVS branches
Date Fri, 10 May 2002 07:21:57 GMT
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > David Crossley wrote:
> > 
> > Would someone please clarify what needs to happen
> > with documentation in regard to the CVS branches.
> > 
> > I have been updating some documents and adding some
> > new ones. I have been adding this only to the HEAD of
> > CVS and not into the 2.0.3 branch.
> > 
> > I gather that only code bugfixes need to go into the
> > 2.0.3 branch. Is that correct? I am trying to minimise work.
> > --David
>
> The 2.0.3 branch is a "bugfixes only" branch, this means no
> new or experimental code should go in there.
> I think if the documentation is valid for 2.0.3 as well
> it should go there, too. Because if we do a 2.0.3 release
> all will benefit from this new docs asap.

Ah thanks. Yes it is important to get some new docs out
with the next release. I had forgotten about that aspect.
--David

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message