boring yes, but accurate. I've not seen a great tendancy in towards
marketing in other Cocoon package names. Mundane and useful I think works
for most people....leave the marketing for the docs...
> ----------
> From: Carsten Ziegeler[SMTP:cziegeler@s-und-n.de]
> Reply To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:08 AM
> To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [vote] Development Roadmap
>
>
> Steven Noels wrote:
> >
> > Carsten wrote:
> >
> > > > a) the sunXXXX stuff must change name and things must be
> > > refactored to
> > > > understand what is a global feature and what is a sample. I
> > > would like
> > > > Carsten to propose a plan on this specificaly
> > > >
> > > Yes, a name change is really required. Unfortunately, we are
> > > currently not
> > > very creative here...so if anyone has a good suggestion, let us know.
> >
> > boring but effective (and Zope-like): Cocoon Portal Toolkit or Framework
> > or CPT/CPF?
> >
> > Or if we need pronouncable words: POC (Portal Components), portal, ...
> >
>
> First we need some good package names. Of course the effective approach
> would
> be to use something like "session", "authentication" and "portal", but
> that's
> really boring.
>
> Carsten
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
|