Return-Path: 
 <cocoon-dev-return-24588-apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive=xml.apache.org@xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 89278 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2002 15:01:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>
Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 89266 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2002 15:01:56 -0000
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 16:01:55 +0100 (CET)
From: Torsten Curdt <tcurdt@dff.st>
X-X-Sender: <tcurdt@mogh.dff.local>
To: <cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>, Ivelin Ivanov <ivelin@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: SchemoX forms
In-Reply-To: <012901c1d01e$2653b1a0$0c91fea9@galina>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0203201556200.29160-100000@mogh.dff.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Ivelin Ivanov wrote:

> Torsten,
>
> >
> > After rethinking the whole stuff I have to admit I don't like the
> > phase concept :(
> >
> > For SoC the phases should *not* be in the preceptor. The preceptor should
> > not have to change if you move a textbox from one view into another.
> > That's not a clean approach...
>
> I just thought that this may change your mind.
> If you move the text box from one view to another, then you'd just shift one
> of the <active-patttern> elements from one phase to another in the schema.
> Does this sound counter-intuitive?

Well, true... but what has the definition of how the XML is allowed to
look to do with where my textbox will appear in my application?

IMHO - nothing (MVC!)
--
Torsten


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org