Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 64205 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2002 13:22:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 64194 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2002 13:22:33 -0000 Message-ID: <3CA1C6C2.1060005@anyware-tech.com> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 14:18:58 +0100 From: Sylvain Wallez Organization: Anyware Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204 X-Accept-Language: en, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Treeprocessor the default engine? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Torsten Curdt wrote: >On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > >>TreeProcessor will be the default engine in the next release. >>I would like to see it set as default starting right away. >> >>What do you guys think? >> > >...there are still some issues... > Which ones ? Jeremy found a bug in view handling a few hours after 2.0.2 went out, but it's now fixed. There are still some ongoing discussions about views, but it's not treeprocessor-specific and it behaves just like the compiled engine. >as soon as everything is fixed +1 > Well, from my POV, +1 ;) Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies Apache Cocoon http://www.anyware-tech.com mailto:sylvain@apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org