Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 8138 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2002 20:30:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 8120 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2002 20:30:41 -0000 Subject: Re: Everywhere licences From: "Theodore W. Leung" To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Cc: Apache XML PMC In-Reply-To: <3C8F4DAB.60204B2@apache.org> References: <3C8F4DAB.60204B2@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 14 Mar 2002 12:30:49 -0800 Message-Id: <1016137850.5701.11.camel@dev> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N As I recall, Dirk was the one who suggested licenses next to the jar files -- this is what all the other XML projects are doing. FOP did not resolve their license issue with Jimi -- they decided to put a "go here and download Jimi from Sun" readme file in. Also, you guys still have an issue with Jisp, because the license only covers source distribution, not binary -- kind of like djb's Qmail license. Ted On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 05:01, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > why do we have all these licences in different places, most (all?) > > of them are in the legal directory, but some are also(!) in the > > lib/core and lib/optional directory. > > > > And some are even misnamed (we have xalan 2.2.0 licence, but > > xalan 2.3.1 jar; same with xerces etc.) > > > > Can we sort this out? > > "Morrison, John" wrote: > > > > A higher authority spoke. > > > > Can't remember who put them in, but I didn't recognise the username. > > Check the CVS history. > > Ted Leung did, on behalf of the XML PMC. > > But I completely agree with Carsten: dear PMC, please, tell us: is it > fine to have *all* the legal stuff in the /legal directory instead of > having it intermixed with the rest of the jars and such? > > Can we go ahead and remove those licenses in /lib and just go on on > /legal as we have been doing in the past? > > Moreover: did the FOP project resolve the issue with the JIMI library > which is currently the only one we have legal problems with? > > Thanks. > > -- > Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be > able to give birth to a dancing star. > Friedrich Nietzsche > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org