cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <>
Subject Re: Everywhere licences
Date Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:01:31 GMT
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Hi,
> why do we have all these licences in different places, most (all?)
> of them are in the legal directory, but some are also(!) in the
> lib/core and lib/optional directory.
> And some are even misnamed (we have xalan 2.2.0 licence, but
> xalan 2.3.1 jar; same with xerces etc.)
> Can we sort this out?

"Morrison, John" wrote:
> A higher authority spoke.
> Can't remember who put them in, but I didn't recognise the username.
> Check the CVS history.

Ted Leung did, on behalf of the XML PMC.

But I completely agree with Carsten: dear PMC, please, tell us: is it
fine to have *all* the legal stuff in the /legal directory instead of
having it intermixed with the rest of the jars and such?

Can we go ahead and remove those licenses in /lib and just go on on
/legal as we have been doing in the past?

Moreover: did the FOP project resolve the issue with the JIMI library
which is currently the only one we have legal problems with?


Stefano Mazzocchi      One must still have chaos in oneself to be
                          able to give birth to a dancing star.
<>                             Friedrich Nietzsche

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, email:

View raw message