Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 19082 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2002 19:14:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 19071 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2002 19:14:08 -0000 Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 19:13:34 +0000 Subject: Re: Xerces2 jar not compressed? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v480) From: Stuart Roebuck To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <00a301c1b0d2$10149690$670004c0@PC103> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Friday, February 8, 2002, at 06:54 pm, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Since I've see that the Xerces jar is about 1.6Mb, I remade it with > compression on and the resulting size is 834kb. I haven't checked the > other jars, but IMHO bandwith could benefit from some compression. There's supposed to be a trade off between compression and runtime speed unless this is another performance tuning rule that doesn't apply anymore. I've always wondered what difference to performance it would make to: a) Merge all the jar files together into one (uncompressed) file. b) Extract out all the jar files into the same filespace and run them outside of a jar. Unfortunately I've never had time to give it a try! Stuart. Public Key - 1024D/88DD65AF 2001-11-23 Stuart Roebuck (Adolos) Key fingerprint = 89D9 E405 F8B1 9B22 0FA2 F2C1 9E57 5AB1 88DD 65AF ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stuart Roebuck stuart.roebuck@adolos.com Systems Architect Java, XML, MacOS X, XP, etc. ADOLOS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org