Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 63941 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2002 14:02:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 63930 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2002 14:02:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Bertrand Delacretaz Reply-To: bdelacretaz@codeconsult.ch Organization: codeconsult To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: [OT] who reads documentation / Lucene (Was:[PROPOSAL] mulitple actions per class) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:02:31 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020213140232.6F78223CD4@dj.codeconsult.ch> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wednesday 13 February 2002 14:58, Matthew Langham wrote: >. . . > We wrote quite a bit of documentation to go with the work we do - all > nicely done in XML and then generated into HTML or PDF - using Cocoon > (of course). > > BUT NO ONE READS IT! That's the sad truth (and probably the same > everywhere). >. . . I think people are getting used to "googling" through docs: search a few keywords and get a list of documents. In that sense, the integration of Lucene in Cocooon 2.0.1 is certainly a Good Thing - IMHO what you want to give to your users is a searchable website of your docs, that lives and grows as you expand the system being built. - Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org