Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F0ABED34C@xatl02.atl.hp.com>
From: "DZIEMBOWSKI,KINGA (HP-NewJersey,ex2)" <kinga_dziembowski@hp.com>
To: "'cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org'" <cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Dispatcher/Adapter
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:02:18 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

Dims,

1. First I like to ask somebody to make all the explanations about which
component can be registered where and why ( cocoon.xconf or sitemap.xmap )
available in the documentation. I feel very strong that it is important
piece of information helping developers to make correct choices.

2. The capability to register multi-item sitemap components in cocoon.xconf
is new, and exists for post release code correct?

Now, I switched my registration to cocoon.xconf and it seems to work
correctly. I am ready to generate the diffs.
We can assume this part is done.

The meaning of this switch is - no more necessity to modify sitemap core
objects, and sitemap.xsl this is very important.

I will generate the diff files and update the download site.

For the Vadim suggestion I will send the message soon (we are in the HP-SOAP
release and many thinks happens...).

Kinga


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:dims@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 2:15 PM
> To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
> Cc: kingadziembowska
> Subject: Re: Dispatcher/Adapter
> 
> 
> Kinga,
> 
> Do you have a patch ready against the latest CVS? If yes, am 
> ready to take a look to come up with
> suggestions for "HttpServletRequest/HttpRequest/Request" problem. 
> 
> Can you also please reply to Vadim's suggestions?
> (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=101327218816330&w=2)
> 
> Thanks,
> dims
> 
> > Thanks for clarifications. For Adapter, the better place 
> for registration is
> > cocoon.xconf . I am glad that it is possible. This way the 
> sitemap protocol
> > is not violated, the modifications to the sitemap "family" 
> of objects is not
> > needed. Simple and clean.
> >
> > Done.
> > 
> > Now what we do with the 
> HttpServletRequest/HttpRequest/Request problem ?
> > 
> > Kinga
> 
> =====
> Davanum Srinivas - http://jguru.com/dims/
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!
> http://greetings.yahoo.com
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org