Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 49668 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2002 22:36:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 49657 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2002 22:36:48 -0000 From: "Vadim Gritsenko" To: , Subject: RE: confusing Bugzilla options for Cocoon Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 17:35:35 -0500 Message-ID: <002e01c1adcc$437131f0$90a4558b@vgritsenkopc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <02020315383703.19111@igacer> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Can somebody take care of this - who have access/knowledge of the bugzilla? Thanks, Vadim > From: David Crossley [mailto:crossley@indexgeo.com.au] > > I find that the Bugzilla options for Cocoon "version" are > extremely confusing ... > > a) 2.0 > b) 2.0alpha CVS > c) 2.0b1 > d) 2.0b2 > e) 2.0rc1 > f) 2.0rc2 > g) 2.1alpha CVS <=== default > > I gather that a) is the recent major release, and that c-f are > old beta releases. I know that g) is the one that i want to use, > i.e. the current CVS. > > However, i wonder if c-f still need to be listed, and b) is > not relevant anymore. We cannot afford to confuse potential > contributers. > > --David Crossley --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org