cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sylvain Wallez <>
Subject Re: Aggregate and views [was : Re: Interpreted Sitemap?]
Date Fri, 08 Feb 2002 16:43:34 GMT
giacomo wrote:

>On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>>giacomo wrote:
>>>On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>>>>As for the last issue with view and aggregation, could some view-guru
>>>>explain exactly how are to be handled the different parts of an
>>>>aggregate with the different cases (no label, label on map:part and/or
>>>There has been a thread on that weeks ago between Stefano and me. You'll
>>>have to look in the archives.
>>Could you please confirm that views on aggregation is defined as follows ?
>><map:part> :
>>- if no view is requested, all parts are added,
>>- if the requested view corresponds to one of the labels of at least one
>>of the parts, only matching parts are added,
>>- if the requested view doesn't correspond to any of the labels of any
>>of the parts, all parts are added, just like when no view is requested.
>><map:aggregate> :
>>- acts like a generator, i.e. it reacts to its label and views
>>- handling of an aggregate's label is independent from the labels of its
>>parts, i.e. it doesn't depend on whether some parts were filtered or not.
>>This mainly on the third point for <map:part> (the view doesn't match
>>any label of any part) that I'd like confirmation.
>Well, I have to dig into the sitemap.xsl and some other code to really
>see how I've implemented it (cannot remember by heart).
Mmmh, since this specification comes from a reverse engineering of 
sitemap.xsl, don't loose time digging ;)

I'll correct the current aggregate/view bug in interpreted sitemap so 
that it conforms to this, and we'll see if it's satisfactory.


Sylvain Wallez
Anyware Technologies -

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, email:

View raw message