cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vadim Gritsenko" <vadim.gritse...@verizon.net>
Subject RE: Dispatcher/Adapter
Date Sat, 09 Feb 2002 00:24:32 GMT
> From: giacomo [mailto:giacomo@apache.org]
> 
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, DZIEMBOWSKI,KINGA (HP-NewJersey,ex2) wrote:
> 
> > > >
> > > > So, Vadim, why are they there?
> > >
> > > To show off the possibility ;)
> > > There was concern raised: lots of "org.apache.cocoon....." in
> > > sitemap.xmap scares newbies away, and I kind of agree with this
> > > statement (remembering these days when had a look at (IIRC)
Jetspeed
> > > configuration)
> > >
> > > So we need to come to some conclusion on this and (may be)
> > > move most of
> > > the standard components into cocoon.xconf. This will allow us to
have
> > > clean sitemap.xmap.
> > >
> > > Vadim
> >
> > I do prefer to register Adapter components in the cocoon.xconf. The
Adapter
> > components are not part of the pipeline definition and it is better
to
> > register them in cocoon.xconf rather than in sitemap.
> > Please somebody confirm that components registered in the
cocoon.xconf got
> > this same "treatment" as those from sitemap. Configuration etc.
> 
> Yes, they got configurations, but they will not be setup like sitemap
> component (means no objectModel, Resolver, etc.).

They will be. When looked up by sitemap. Otherwise, how it works now?

Vadim

> 
> Giacomo



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message