Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 23842 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2002 17:11:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 23827 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2002 17:11:30 -0000 Message-ID: <3C597AC9.E26DE4AF@apache.org> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:11:37 +0100 From: Stefano Mazzocchi X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Recent test results References: <200201302224.g0UMOFm19874@orion.rgv.hp.com> <3C5949B3.9040004@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Berin Loritsch wrote: > > Ovidiu Predescu wrote: > > > This looks really promising! Could you elaborate on what caused this > > major performance boost? > > Looking at it again, the biggest performance boost was figuring out the > requests for minutes, and reporting it for a second. It was a bad math error, > and I appologize for that. ihihih :) > In essence, we have cut down to 2/3 the speed we had about a week ago. I have the perception there is lot's of room to grow here, so expect speed increase constantly over the next 2.0.x releases. -- Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star. Friedrich Nietzsche -------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org