Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 24534 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2002 06:33:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 24523 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2002 06:33:14 -0000 Subject: Re: Support for Cocoon 1 From: "Andrew C. Oliver" To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org In-Reply-To: <001f01c1a631$6c1fb470$a800a8c0@id3> References: <001f01c1a631$6c1fb470$a800a8c0@id3> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.0.99+cvs.2001.12.18.08.57 (Preview Release) Date: 10 Jan 2002 01:25:33 -0500 Message-Id: <1010643934.3737.1967.camel@linux2.superlinksoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Dear Frans, This is the development list so it is about the development of Cocoon which is all centered on the new version. On the cocoon-users list you may find more mention of 1.8.2. I've seen reference to it there. Truth be told I'd say Cocoon 2 is a safer choice, but thats my opinion. You'll be much happier with its advanced features, ease of use and performance. -Andy On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 03:40, Frans Thamura wrote: > Dear All, > > I see there is no discussion for cocoon 1.8.2 and there is no answer of it in last 3 months. > > Do you all of you not to support it?? > > and Why? > > Frans -- www.superlinksoftware.com www.sourceforge.net/projects/poi - port of Excel format to java http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html - fix java generics! The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. -Ambassador Kosh --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org