Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 75149 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2001 23:02:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 75016 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2001 23:02:15 -0000 Message-ID: <3C12992F.FFA7F34C@apache.org> Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2001 23:50:23 +0100 From: Stefano Mazzocchi X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: CVSGenerater(was: [Vote] Improving Cocoon Site) References: <003001c17eff$6ab8f0f0$0c64140a@gmservice.de> <3C109462.DCA7899E@apache.org> <20011207160233.D8195@london.dvs1.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Christian Haul wrote: > > On 07.Dec.2001 -- 11:05 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > Wouldn't it be nicer to have an cvs: protocol. > > > > Oh, totally. There is a JCVS tool which includes a CVS protocol stack > > implementation (but I think it's GPL-ed). > > Stefano, > > isn't there an effort to do some rewording of the ASF Licence to make > it (more) compatible with (L)GPL ? Yes, but this "more" means that we aim to allow GPL-ed software to be able to include ASFL-ed software. The other way around is impossible by design for the GPL and strongly disliked for LGPL-ed java stuff because of possible issues with dynamic linking. The only "legal" way seems to be that of using complete reflection based calls to the API, but that would be a performance trouble to say the least. Anyway, as Ken pointed out to me privately, there is a legally-compatible implementation of a CVS protocol stack for netbeans. > Is that going to help here? No, not for JCVS, but the netbeans code is fully compatible being the license the sun version of the Mozilla Public License. > reckon ASF is not going to 'dual' licence its code? Nop. The ASF members agree that dual licensing is, at the very least, asking for legal trouble down the road. And normally, a legal hack made by developers to go around license restrictions targetted to lawyers which real legal implication they don't really understand. Anyway, the netbeans code removes all our legal problems anyway. -- Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star. Friedrich Nietzsche -------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org