cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From giacomo <giac...@apache.org>
Subject Re: @version CVS keyword consistency (was: Re: Lucene package)
Date Sat, 22 Dec 2001 19:30:57 GMT
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:

> giacomo wrote:
>
> > Could the author of the Lucene package add a CVS id and an author line
> > as it is the case for (I hope) all other source file? And also adjust
> > the coding according to the convention used here at Cocoon.
>
>
> Well, this was the right time to remind me that I forgot to do it myself
> to the code I contributed :)
>
> However, I found out that there seems to be no consistency between us in
> CVS keywords. Wouldn't it be the case to agree on a consistent way to
> insert version tags in the source? Basically someone is using $Id$
> (including myself) while others seems to use "CVS $Revision$ $Date$". Is
> there already a standard that I'm missing or should we come up with one?

I don't know of a standard, so my proposal is to use $Id$ as well
because it is mostly complete concerning information inserted into the
checked in files.

Giacomo

>
> Ciao,
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message