cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vadim Gritsenko" <vadim.gritse...@verizon.net>
Subject RE: Planning the next release (was Re: patch politics)
Date Tue, 18 Dec 2001 14:48:09 GMT
> From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziegeler@s-und-n.de]
> 
> Giacomo Pati wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Carsten Ziegeler <cziegeler@s-und-n.de>:
> >
> > > Giacomo Pati wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Team,
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it's time to think of a new release which should be
> > > > > a maintainance release. We have fixed some bugs, cleaned up
> > > > > parts of the docs etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, what else should be done? I see currently two points:
> > > > >
> > > > > a) The changing of the directory structure according to the
> > > proposal.
> > > > >
> > > > > b) "Forgetting the 2.0 branch" to maintain only one CVS
version.
> > > This
> > > > >    requires to move all experimental stuff into the scratchpad
area.
> > > > >    We have to be sure to be compatible with 2.0!
> > > > >
> > > > > So what do you think about it? Perhaps a volunteer for a)?
> > > >
> > > > I can do a) in the HEAD (I don't think we should do it in 2.0
branch)
> > > >
> > > Great!
> > > I agree with you here, but we should then make a 2.0.1 release
from
> > > the HEAD. So then we really do not need to worry about the 2.0
branch
> > > anymore.
> >
> > As we have applied all the patches *also* to the 2.0 branch we
> > can (for a 2.0.1
> > release) build it from there and stick with HEAD afterwards (no
> > more synching)
> >
> Hm, no I think that we then have the same situation as now. The HEAD
and
> the 2.0 branch differ in some points. Sooner or later we have to
decide
> what of the new functions in the HEAD should be in the next release
> of Cocoon.
> So I think we should move everything which is additional to the 2.0
branch
> in the scratchpad area. There might be exceptions for this rule.
> We can then directly make a 2.0.1 version from the HEAD and afterwards
> move that parts from the scratchpad area back to the src which are
> finished.
> 
> If we first would do a 2.0.1 from the 2.0 branch, we still need to
move
> some parts of the HEAD in the scratchpad area.
> 
> I feel that making a 2.0.1 from a "cleanup" HEAD is a little bit less
work.

Agree with that. +1 for 2.0.1 from the HEAD.

Vadim 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org


Mime
View raw message