Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 97196 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2001 08:12:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 97185 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2001 08:12:05 -0000 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: let us get serious about 2.0 Final Release Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:13:32 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal In-reply-to: <01112102354509.00848@igacer> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 21.11.2001 09:12:15, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 21.11.2001 09:12:16, Serialize complete at 21.11.2001 09:12:16 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N David Crossley wrote: > > Giacomo Pati wrote: > > Quoting David Crossley : > > > > > There are SIX DAYS TO GO until the agreed date for the > > > final release. We also agreed that the date should not slip. > > > > > > In my opinion, 2.0 is not yet fit for release. So there is only > > > one option ... hold the RT threads and get on with the job. > > > --David > > > > What is it you think needs to be fixed before releaseing it? We should also wait for the final release of Xalan 2 - which is expected in the first days of december. Carsten > > Giacomo > > ** Documentation, documentation, documentation > - stop apologising for Cocoon 1 > - positive announcement.xml and index.xml > - both of those docs need a concise overiew at top > (something less than half-a-page that convinces boss) > - much of the documentation is old and still talks about > Cocoon 1 configuration methods and issues > - much documentation still has "Under construction" notices > - people will turn away in droves > > ** cocoon.xconf needs all parameters and components > listed and briefly explained as internal documentation > > ** The excellent document "How to Develop Web Applications" > and the accompanying webapp.tutorial are missing from > the cocoon_20_branch > > ** Better stylesheet for xml.apache.org/cocoon2/ > - the slow response of the website will not allow 2.0 to > make its impact. > > Also the following issues are summarised at > documentation/xdocs/plan/release.xml ... > > ** We have many open bugs in bugzilla > ** Layout the distribution > ** Ensure that licensing requirements have been met > ** Decide what to backport from the 2.1 head > > --David > > > > -------------------------- > > > > Subject: [C2.0] Should we set a date for 2.0 Final Release? > > > > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:55:15 +0200 > > > > From: Martin Man > > > > To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org > > > > > > > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > > > Ok, yes, I didnt check the calendar. Thanks for the hint! > > > > > > > > > > As I still prefer mondays, we should set the dates to > > > > > 5th November: RC2 > > > > > 26th November: Final Release > > > > > > > > yep, my +1 also for both dates, BTW: without looking to the > > > > repository, do we have actualized TODO list... I mean critical > > > > isuues (not including documentation) to fix ??? > > > > > > -------------------------- > > > > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:37:57 +0200 > > > > From: "Carsten Ziegeler" > > > > To: , > > > > > > > > you're absolutely right. It's the same problem here. > > > > Due to the many changes I would propose a RC2. > > > > But we still need more documentation! So a good > > > > date could be 1st of November for the RC2 and > > > > end of november for the final release. > > > > > > > > But whatever date we decide on for the final > > > > release, we *should* stick to it. > > > > > > > > Carsten > > > > Open Source Group sunShine - b:Integrated > > > > ================================================================ > > > > Carsten Ziegeler, S&N AG, Klingenderstrasse 5, D-33100 Paderborn > > > > www.sundn.de mailto: cziegeler@sundn.de > > > > ================================================================ > > > > > > > > Dims wrote: > > > > > Team, > > > > > Should we set a date for 2.0 Final Release? (or the next Release > > > > > Candidate)? Am a bit tired of > > > > > hearing from people (in my organization) that we cannot switch > > > > > from C1.X to C2.0 since it is in > > > > > Beta/RC Cycle.... > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > dims > > > > > ===== > > > > > Davanum Srinivas - http://jguru.com/dims/ > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > > > For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org