Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 76514 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2001 14:33:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 76503 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2001 14:33:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: David Crossley Reply-To: crossley@indexgeo.com.au To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Assistance with tidy of Ctwig docs Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 01:35:31 +1100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <20011121140623.45523.qmail@web14510.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20011121140623.45523.qmail@web14510.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0111220135310D.00848@igacer> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jeremy Aston wrote: > > Cool > I had said to Stefano that I would pick that up. Was going to do it in the next day or so but saved me a job! Anything else a new bod could do (new to c2 mods not coding that is)? > cheers > jez Actually Jeremy, there is something very important that you would be ideal to help with. There are a lot of mentions in ctwig about specific version numbers of releases (e.g. 2.0rc2) hardcoded. These need to be fixed, as the documentation should only discuss the current release. We really should only mention specific version numbers when absolutely neccessary, and then be prepared to change such mentions. Also, i notice that the head branch and cocoon_20_branch have differences between the ctwig docs. regards, David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org