cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gerhard Froehlich" <>
Subject RE: Missing Implementation in MRUStore
Date Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:07:28 GMT
Whoops, that was quick!
>> >is there any reason why the keys() method of the MRUStore is
>> >not implemented?
>> Laziness, forgetfulness :). Will be corrected.
>> >The returned enumeration should contain all keys of the cache
>> >and the underlying fs store, right?
>> Can be very slow when there are many objects on the fs....
>Indeed, but usually clients of the Store rarely need to call this
>method and if they do it's their fault...But it should be implemented
>regardless of performance issues.
Ok, but I warned you :)
>> >In addition is the implementation if the containsKey() method
>> >correct? It checks only against the memory cache but not
>> >against the filesystem.
>> The problem is, that to much fs I/O can react negative on the performance.
>> Because of that containsKey() only checks the memory...But you're
>> right this is in-consistent.
>I would rather call it wrong ;) Will you please fix this, too?
Wrong is such a evil word. Pedagogically not very useful ;). 
Ok joke, I will fix this next days!


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, email:

View raw message