Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 88305 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2001 15:14:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 88294 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2001 15:14:44 -0000 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: [STATUS] architecture design Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 16:16:12 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 30.10.2001 16:14:58, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 30.10.2001 16:14:59, Serialize complete at 30.10.2001 16:14:59 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Matthew Langham wrote: > > Hi Michael (and team), > > >> > >>>Ok, you guys add more comments if you need to. > >>> > >>There is still some thought in my mind about dbXML (or other XML > >>DBs) which could result in a new protocol for a Source of XML. > >> > >Halfway there, hope to have a working version by the end of this week... > >:) > > > How difficult is it to write such a new protocol ? I am currently > working on integrating Cocoon 2 with Documentum, and we are planning to > add a "docbase" protocol for accessing XML documents directly from > Documentum repository servers. > << > > Documentum sounds very interesting. Is this something you are planning on > committing to Cocoon? We have been doing quite a bit of work > connecting our > Cocoon based solution to Software AGs Tamino database. We are currently > considering rewriting what we have done as a protocol. > > So, is the addition of new protocols such as Documentum, Tamino etc. > something the Cocoon community in general would be interested in? > Absolutely! +1 for documentum +1 for tamino Carsten > Matthew > > -- > Open Source Group sunShine - Lighting up e:Business > ================================================================= > Matthew Langham, S&N AG, Klingenderstrasse 5, D-33100 Paderborn > Tel: +49-5251-1581-30 [mlangham@sundn.de - http://www.sundn.de] > ================================================================= > > > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > Von: Michael Hartle [mailto:mhartle@hartle-klug.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 29. Oktober 2001 23:44 > An: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [STATUS] architecture design > > > Gianugo Rabellino wrote: > > >>>Ok, you guys add more comments if you need to. > >>> > >>There is still some thought in my mind about dbXML (or other XML > >>DBs) which could result in a new protocol for a Source of XML. > >> > >Halfway there, hope to have a working version by the end of this week... > >:) > > > How difficult is it to write such a new protocol ? I am currently > working on integrating Cocoon 2 with Documentum, and we are planning to > add a "docbase" protocol for accessing XML documents directly from > Documentum repository servers. > > Best regards, > > Michael Hartle > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org > For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org