Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-cocoon-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 87328 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2001 15:59:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 87309 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2001 15:59:20 -0000 From: "Torsten Curdt" To: "Cocoon-Dev" Subject: cocoon:/ and content aggregation Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 16:59:17 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N AFAIK the cocoon: protocol has a scope of the current sitemap. But I need to aggregate a resource from the parent sitemap. Since it is also at the servlet context I tried: ... ... This did not work. Then I tried: ... ... This seems to work. Then I figured out I could create a mapping in the current sitemap with a generator grabbing the XML file via the context: protocol. So it would be accessible in the subsitemap: ... ... ... Now this leads to some questions: 1. Shouldn't the context: "protocol" also work at the src attribute of map:part? 2. Was is the expense of not using the cocoon: protocol at map:part? Comments? -- Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org